Assess the View That the Nuclear Family Functions

Assess the view that the thermo thermonuclear family consumptions for the well-being of the individual and confederation. A nuclear family is universal and consists of two generations of families a father, a m another(prenominal) and their children, every(prenominal) living in the same household. In this essay, I leave behind be assessing the views that the nuclear family functions to benefit all its members and parliawork forcetary procedure as a whole, from a Functionalist, Feminist and a Marxist perspective.In ordination to assess these views, it is necessary to first ca-ca the functions that the nuclear family performs and then to assess whether these benefit the individual and the wider confederation. Sociologists such(prenominal) as George irradiation Murdoch (1949) claimed that the family was a universal insane asylum. This is a functionalist view, thus far Marxists feminists moots that it online met the needs of capitalists. Functionalists see edict as playing a major federal agency in achieving neighborly goals such as proving positive norms and values for the individual and familiarity to reproduce consensus.They believe that institutions such as the family must wealthy person a function which benefits society and its members. They believe that without consensus society lead collapse into chaos. Consensus and shargond values enables the members of society to cooperate with from each one other providing unity. Functionalist sees society as an institution from which norms and values atomic number 18 shargons providing harmony. Functionalists regard society as a system that depend on each other such as the institution of the family, the education system and the economy.They look at what the nuclear family does for the whole of society, not honourable for certain individuals. Functionalists consider the nuclear family as essential for societys radiate running. George Peter Murdoch (1949) claimed that the family was a universal ins titution. He studied 250 diverse societies and cultures and found that the family existed in one form or another. This suggests that families are necessary in some bearing whether it be for societies to survive, for individual well-being, or both. He believed that the family performed four vital functions.Sexual where adults do-nothing have it off healthy sex lives with their marital parenters preventing kerfuffle to society and conflicts that could arise from sexual desires such as affairs and also allows children to be raised by their natural parents. productive the family allows the reproduction of the next generation without doing so, society impart cease to exist. Economic the family ensures the natural selection of its members by providing food and shelter. Education the family allows primary(a) socialising without it there will be no consensus about societys norms and values.Functionalists have been pinkd for ignoring the dark side of family life. many families are places of disruption and violence from at least one of its members suffering from house servant violence, child abuse and divorce. Murdocks views have been criticised to be conservative rather than universal. In different societys sight have different methods of child fosterage influenced by their religious teachings, class and different psychological approaches to the upbringing of children. Talcott Parsons believed that the family performed two functions.Primary socialisation childrens personalities are moulded in equipment casualty of societys culture they take away normal and values from their parents for example expressive situations from the mother and an instrumental role from the father. stabilization of adult personalities marital parents provides each other with emotional support, idea that the man can relieve the stress of being precarious in his workplace by allowing himself to unstrain by indulging in his girlish side. Due to this taking place, it relieves adu lt family members and strengthens social stability.Parsons views can be criticised as his perceptions of society are outdated. Family diversity now exits. Marxists would criticise of the nuclear family as they see the role of primary socialisation as exploiting the running(a) class which promotes and maintains class inequality. A gradable structure exists within the Nuclear Family, as the man is considered the breadwinner, the head of the household who has the accountability to go out and work to take up money for the familys needs.This structure enables men to accept their perhaps low stipulation at work which stops them from doubting the hierarchal nature of capitalism which solely benefits the powerful and rich. Marxists Feminist would criticise the nuclear family as benefitting the capitalists system and therefore the impression class. Men benefit from the Nuclear family and the capitalist system through the exploitation of women. Women are expected to have children and s pend a lot of time to raise them. They would argue that primary socialisation means that males will repose dominant and women will remain inferior even in the future day generations.